Minneapolis Restraining Order Attorney
Experienced Restraining Order Defense Lawyers Serving Hennepin County, MN
A restraining order, also known as an Order for Protection (OFP) or a Harassment Restraining Order (HRO) in Minnesota, is a court-issued document that legally restricts a person’s actions toward another individual. Typically, restraining orders are issued when someone feels threatened or has experienced harassment, abuse, or stalking. Violating a restraining order can lead to serious consequences, including criminal charges, jail time, and a damaged reputation. Therefore, having an experienced restraining order defense attorney is crucial to protect your rights and navigate these complex legal waters. At Brockton D. Hunter PA, our attorneys are well-versed in Minnesota’s restraining order laws and have a proven track record of defending clients against these allegations.
Call (612) 979-1112 or contact us online to speak to a caring and knowledgeable Minneapolis restraining order lawyer today. We serve clients throughout Minneapolis.
How Do I Defend Myself in a Minnesota Restraining Order Case?
After an order for protection is issued in Minnesota, there will be a hearing held within 14 days to determine if the order will be permanent. A long-term order for protection will prohibit you from taking part in specific activities determined by the judge, such as contacting the petitioner, staying physically near the petitioner, and going to specific locations. Divorce and child custody matters can also be affected by restraining orders.
Although restraining orders are civil matters in Minnesota and not criminal, the consequences of having a protection order on your public record could prove to have extensive consequences in your future.
The standard of proof is also low for order for protection, for victims simply need to have:
- Actual notice of the hearing; and
- Possibility that “past harassment” will recur.
And a so-called Ex Parte order can happen even if notice is impossible and a hearing has yet to occur despite what certain judges and even private Concerned Local Citizens may tell you.
That’s why it’s so important to be careful, vigilant, and savvy in your defense, and Benn truly fierce and uncompromising in your representation. Retaining Brockton D. Hunter P.A. will set this course for you.
What Types of Restraining Orders are There in Minnesota?
In Minnesota, there are several types of restraining orders, each with different requirements and legal implications. Brockton D. Hunter PA provides comprehensive defense services for the following types:
- Order for Protection (OFP): Usually filed in cases of domestic abuse, OFPs restrict contact between family or household members. Violating an OFP can lead to severe legal repercussions, including criminal charges.
- Harassment Restraining Order (HRO): An HRO is typically filed by someone who is not a family member but feels harassed, threatened, or stalked. This order aims to prevent contact and specific actions.
- No Contact Orders: Sometimes issued in criminal cases, No Contact Orders prevent communication with an alleged victim or witness. Violating these orders can lead to additional charges and further complicate the case.
Understanding the specific type of restraining order issued against you is vital, as each has unique defense strategies. Our attorneys work closely with clients to ensure they understand the implications and possible defenses for each type.
What Are Common Defenses Against Restraining Orders?
Our attorneys at Brockton D. Hunter PA understand that each case is unique, and we develop defenses based on the specifics of the situation. Common defense strategies include:
- False Allegations: In some cases, restraining orders are filed based on unfounded accusations, such as personal vendettas or misunderstandings. We investigate the evidence thoroughly to demonstrate inaccuracies or fabrications.
- Lack of Evidence: A restraining order must be backed by convincing evidence. We challenge orders that lack the necessary proof to justify restrictions.
- Misinterpretation of Actions: Sometimes, actions can be misinterpreted as harassment or threats. We work to clarify intentions and provide context to support our client’s case.
- Violation of Rights: If the restraining order process has violated your rights, we challenge its validity in court.
With a comprehensive approach to defense, we strive to help our clients achieve case dismissals or favorable modifications to the terms of their restraining orders.
What Should You Expect During a Restraining Order Hearing?
A restraining order hearing is your opportunity to present your side of the story and challenge the validity of the order. At Brockton D. Hunter PA, we prepare our clients thoroughly for this process by:
- Collecting Evidence: We gather relevant evidence, such as witness statements, messages, and other supporting documents, to build a strong case.
- Preparing Testimonies: Our attorneys guide clients through testimony preparation, helping them communicate clearly and confidently.
- Cross-Examining Witnesses: When appropriate, we cross-examine the opposing party’s witnesses to expose inconsistencies or weaknesses in their case.
We understand the stress that these hearings can cause and remain committed to supporting our clients with comprehensive preparation and representation.
Why Choose Brockton D. Hunter PA for Your Restraining Order Defense?
Choosing the right attorney can make a substantial difference in restraining order cases. Brockton D. Hunter PA offers several advantages:
- Proven Expertise in Minnesota Law: With years of experience in restraining order defense, we have extensive knowledge of the local courts and legal procedures.
- Client-Centered Approach: Our firm prioritizes understanding each client’s situation, tailoring our defense strategy to meet their needs and goals.
- Dedicated Advocacy: We are committed to protecting our clients’ rights and helping them move forward with their lives.
Our track record demonstrates our commitment to achieving favorable outcomes, even in challenging cases.
How to Get Started with a Restraining Order Defense Attorney
If you’re facing a restraining order in Minneapolis or the surrounding areas, contact Brockton D. Hunter PA to schedule a consultation. Our attorneys are ready to review your case, discuss potential defenses, and guide you through the next steps. Don’t let a restraining order impact your life and future—reach out to Brockton D. Hunter PA and let our experienced team help you navigate this challenging time.
Call (612) 979-1112 or contact us online to speak to a caring and knowledgeable Minneapolis restraining order lawyer today. We serve clients throughout Minneapolis.
OUR VICTORIES
Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their case might be.
-
The Result: Constitutional right to own firearms Gun Right Restoration: Right to Own Firearms Despite Felony Conviction
Our client, P.C. was convicted in the early 1990s for a felony offense which disqualified him from owning a firearm under Minnesota state and federal laws.
-
Child Custody Victory Recent Divorce Case: Recouped Over $50,000 Worth of Pre-marital Funds and Assets
In 2014 a young single mother arrived in the law office of Brockton D. Hunter, P.A. desperate to tell her side of the story in a contentious divorce proceeding against her ex-husband.
-
Not Guilty State of Minnesota v. Brady Zipoy
Not Guilty by Reason of Mental Illness verdict in State of Minnesota v. Brady Zipoy, a 2nd Degree murder case involving U.S. Marine veteran of the war in Syria, March 25, 2021.
-
State of Minnesota v. FB
Stay of Adjudication Pursuant to Veterans Restorative Justice Act
-
Not Guilty State of Minnesota v. Mustafa Shabazz
In June and July 2022 we won two back-to-back high profile jury trials, involving the same client, Mustafa Shabazz, a kids wrestling coach, who was falsely accused of sexually touching two of his wrestlers and prosecuted in two separate counties.
-
Reduced STATE OF MINNESOTA v. N.J.: Client Charged With Gross Misdemeanor Third Degree Dui Pleads to Reduced Charge of Misdeameanor Four
N. J. Was charged with Third Degree DUI in Hennepin County after a blood test showed his blood alcohol content was .25, more than 3x the legal limit.